Our Blog

AI has become part of the finance function almost overnight. Not because of a formal rollout or a board-approved initiative, but because it is easy. A finance leader opens a browser, pastes in a P&L, asks a question, and gets an answer in seconds. No approval needed. No friction. No one watching.

That quiet adoption is exactly what makes AI such a powerful tool. It is also what makes it such a serious risk for private equity backed companies.

Most finance leaders using public AI tools are not being careless. They are being practical. They are trying to move faster, pressure test assumptions, or get a second set of eyes on the numbers. The problem is that speed without guardrails can create exposure, and in a PE environment, that exposure rarely stays small.

This is not a future problem. It is already happening inside portfolio companies.

What Actually Happens When Financial Data Goes Into Public AI Tools

There is a common assumption that pasting information into a public AI tool is temporary. Ask a question, get an answer, close the tab, move on. Many leaders believe the data disappears the moment the conversation ends.

In reality, that is often not how these tools work.

Depending on the platform, the data may be logged, retained, reviewed internally, or stored for quality and safety purposes. In some cases, it may be used to improve the model. In others, it may be retained for longer than users expect. Once that data leaves your environment, you no longer control how it is handled, where it is stored, or who ultimately has access to it.

Now consider the type of information finance leaders are working with. Revenue by customer. Pricing structures. Margin profiles. Compensation data. Forecasts. Acquisition assumptions. Pipeline visibility. For a PE backed company, this information is not just sensitive. It is material to the investment.

Most leaders do not realize they have crossed a line until someone raises the question. By then, the data is already outside the company’s control.

The Data Retention and Memory Risk Few Finance Leaders Understand

One of the most misunderstood aspects of consumer AI tools is how memory and retention work.

Some tools store conversation history by default. Some retain data for monitoring or improvement. Some allow users to opt out, but only in paid or enterprise versions. Very few make this clear to casual users.

Finance leaders are not reading terms of service before pasting in a spreadsheet. They assume that deleting a chat or closing a browser window means the data is gone. That assumption is often incorrect.

This creates a dangerous gap between perception and reality. Leaders believe they are using AI as a temporary assistant, when in fact they may be feeding confidential information into systems that sit entirely outside the company’s governance framework.

From a private equity perspective, that is not a minor issue. It is a data control issue, a governance issue, and ultimately a fiduciary issue.

Why This Is a Board and PE Firm Responsibility

It is tempting to frame this as a technology or IT problem. It is not.

Unregulated AI usage in finance touches confidentiality, regulatory compliance, audit readiness, and reputational risk. These are areas where boards and PE firms have clear responsibility.

Allowing sensitive financial information to flow into public AI tools without policy, oversight, or training creates exposure that most firms would never knowingly approve. Depending on the industry and regulatory environment, that exposure can lead to confidentiality breaches, contractual violations, regulatory scrutiny, or audit complications.

The most concerning part is that there is often no visibility. No alerts fire when a spreadsheet is uploaded. No audit trail exists. No approval is required. The risk remains invisible until something goes wrong.

This is why it deserves board-level attention.

The Problem With “Everyone Is Doing It”

One of the most common responses to AI risk concerns is that these tools are ubiquitous. Everyone is using them. It feels unrealistic to restrict something so widely adopted.

But private equity does not operate on what is common. It operates on what is defensible.

Widespread usage does not reduce risk. In many cases, it hides it. The companies that experience issues will not be the ones acting maliciously. They will be the ones acting efficiently, without guidance.

AI adoption without governance is not innovation. It is exposure.

What Portfolio Companies Should Put in Place Now

The answer is not to ban AI. That would be impractical and counterproductive. AI does create real value in finance when used correctly.

What is needed is structure.

Portfolio companies should have clear guidance on what data can and cannot be entered into AI tools. They should identify approved platforms or secure environments for sensitive analysis. Finance and leadership teams should be trained on AI risks in plain language, not legal jargon. Ownership for AI governance should be clearly defined, and it should not sit solely with IT.

Most importantly, policies should be simple. Overly complex rules are ignored. Practical guardrails are followed.

The goal is not to slow teams down. It is to keep them from creating risk they never intended to take on.

What Safe AI Use Looks Like in Finance

The strongest finance organizations are already finding a balance.

They use AI freely for low-risk tasks such as drafting summaries, organizing thoughts, or exploring hypothetical scenarios without real data attached. When sensitive financials are involved, they rely on approved tools or secure internal environments designed for that purpose.

They make sure finance leaders understand where the lines are and why those lines exist. And they treat AI governance as part of modern financial leadership, not a compliance afterthought.

Safe AI use does not mean less AI. It means smarter AI.

AI itself is Not the Problem

The problem is pretending that powerful tools do not require new rules.

For PE backed companies, uncontrolled AI usage inside finance functions is a quiet compliance bomb. It does not announce itself. It does not create immediate pain. It simply sits there until the conditions are right for something to break.

The firms that address this now will protect their portfolio companies, their boards, and their investment theses. The ones that do not may find themselves reacting to an issue they never saw coming.

In private equity, that is rarely a position you want to be in.

Need to chat? Contact us.